Someone wondered: >As you can see, my hunch is that the planning/scheduling/logistics for the >terrorist endeavor could have been managed on old Macs. Probably even on DOS >machines... (though who'd want to?) > >Is it possible that anyone could agree with me?
Possible, yes. But I'm a statistics freak. I'm the gatekeeper at the thin line between reality and wishful 'thinking'. I annoy people a lot with replies like 'so because your mother-in-law AND your sister has this-or-that desease, you think you just discovered an outburst of it? What did your variance and reliability interval look like? What you say? Don't have those/got a clue? Well, with all due respect for your family, stop guessing and leave me to my lunch...' So, No. I don't see any trend towards using compacts, except that an arabic OS may be available. These criminals could have put the time of attack on a postcard to eachother half a year before, not using ANY computer. again, 'could'. But here's my actual point: if this list comes to the unsupported "conclusion" that the 9-11 attackers must've use compacts, I don't want to know. Politically, I'm very aware and even active at times, but not on this list. Still, 9-11 was an awful crime. yours truly, -mart -- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>. Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
