On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:33:29AM -0800, David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote: > Given the move towards a network repository based packaging system, I > think the right thing to do is include Squid 3.0 as a separate version > in that repository. That can most easily be accomplished by > incorporating that version into SFW alongside the existing 2.6 > version.
I think, actually, it might be better served as a one-or-the-other installation, unless there's ever any good reason why you'd have two copies installed at once. The incorporations defining the latest Indiana / Nevada builds could constrain squid to being 2.6, but people could choose 3.x instead if they so chose. Danek
