On Saturday 09 May 2009 10:49:50 you wrote:
<snip>
>
> Cool. I suspect this is the just the compiz default, why I have no idea.
>
> The fglrx driver is typically faster than either open source drivers
> in 3D, but I'll take the performance hit over a binary blob any day.
> I noticed in your logs you are using XAA, you can see if switching to
> EXA makes any of the issues go away. Alternately, theres the
> xf86-video-ati driver you can try as well. It shares a lot of code
> with radeonhd but sometimes it works better.
>
> Wil
Wil,
You got me here. What do you mean EXA v. XAA? How do I change to test?
I have
tested both the radeon and radeonh drivers and can't tell much of a
difference, if any. You also suggest trying the xf86-video-ati. Is it
supposedly faster than the radeon and radeonhd drivers? I'll poke around some
more, but if you have a few extra bits of info on it, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
Telephone: (936) 715-9333
Facsimile: (936) 715-9339
www.rankinlawfirm.com
_______________________________________________
compiz mailing list
compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
