Il giorno mar, 03/10/2006 alle 21.20 -0400, Shawn Starr ha scritto: > > > And a registry editor is better? > > > > Yes, if we're talking about gconf. To integrate nicely with GNOME you > > would need to fetch information through gconf anyway, sooner or later. > > GTK+ gui ( which is a nice thing ) or not I see no reason not to use > > gconf as a backend. > > > Ciao > > ~marco > > Fair, but you assume people use GNOME which needs gconf. That imho should be > decoupled from compiz. As a separate package (David mentioned this already). > As a KDE user, I should not need it, unless compiz is gnome specific only. In > which case, Beryl makes things DE independant (aside from beryl using GTK+ > widgets but everyone has GTK anyway thse days).
You can't *just* make things DE-independent by using a totally random
configuration format. I'm a GNOME user and I'd like a program to have a
gconf backend. You should expect a kwhatthehell backend instead of
whatever beryl is using right now :)
Ciao
~marco
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio è firmata
_______________________________________________ compiz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
