Le jeudi 29 mars 2007, Dennis Kasprzyk a écrit : > Currently there are two types of configuration tools. Some with fixed > functionality and some autogenerated. To improve the quality of the > autogenerated tools I would like to make this proposal about additional > values in the CompOption struct and the plugin vtable.
I really disagree with this... First, i dislike the way compiz deal with options descriptions. Why put this in the code? Just look how kde deal with this: kcfg file (xml files in /usr/share/config.kcfg), it's much cleaner i think. I would prefer one xml description file per plugin usable by configuration tools. We can have tools that create gconf schemas and ini conf files based on this xml files. I don't see any reason having such information in the code, but maybe i'm missing something... Cedric _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
