On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 00:49 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote:
> I am fairly sure that this is just a bug in the codes logic, but
> I thought I should check first

hm, I think the code is currently doing the correct thing.

> 
> I noticed that the function was always returning true if only
> one grab is checked for (maybe other cases too)

I fail to see why. Can you provide some more details of what you're
doing?

- David

_______________________________________________
compiz mailing list
compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz

Reply via email to