David Reveman wrote: > xsltproc is distributed as part of the libxslt package, hence separating > xsltproc and the libxslt.pc file like ubuntu has done seems like a > mistake to me but I guess it doesn't hurt to include a check to ensure > that the binary is present so I've included your patch.
FYI, Mandriva packages it this way too. I did have it installed so wouldn't have noticed. Just because a tarball will result in the building of a binary, does not mean that you have to include all the files created via make install in that tarball. Most packages have libXXX and libXXX-devel etc. subpackages created from them and splitting out different modules/plugins/binaries is fairly common practice too. The pkgconfig check will check that the library development headers are installed but I would argue it doesn't mean that an example application built on that library is installed. So I think the patch is correct like you say, and to be honest I've no idea why I even bothered to write this mail as you've put the patch in, but I just thought I'd wax lyrical for a bit :p Col _______________________________________________ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
