On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Stephen M. Webb <stephen.w...@canonical.com > wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 12:45 PM, Kristian Lyngstøl wrote: > > > > First thing first: Compiz has been using version 0.9 for almost half a > decade, and clearly deviated from past > > conventions of using 0.<odd> for development and 0.<even> for stable. In > addition, a fourth digit has been added. > > > > In the long run I'd like to see the project drop the fourth digit and > instead go back to actively using the digits we > > have available. Adding a digit instead of bumping the ones we have seems > pretty silly. > > In the long run, I'd really like to see version 1 released. I think after > so many years of in-production use it's ready > for a 1.0 release, don't you? > Most certainly. Just like the 9 in 0.9, there shouldn't be any reason not to bump the 0 either. The original plan back in 2010 was that 0.9 would be either the last or second-to-last development series before 1.0. I don't see any reason why that shouldn't still apply. I'm thinking we stick with 0.9.12.x for a while though, since it just came out. I also don't have a very good overview of the current state of bugs, beyond the ones I'm hitting myself. This clearly puts me in a very bad position to judge if a 1.0 is appropriate or not. Ideally I'd also like to get this web-stuff sorted out and get a bit more community-activity first. - Kristian
_______________________________________________ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
