Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Alexandru Stanoi wrote: > >> From what I understand, issue #10896 (http://issues.ez.no/10896) asks >> that URLs of this form: >> (1) http://www.example.com/(param1)/a/(param2)/x/(param2)/y >> >> are treated as if they are of this form: >> (2) http://www.example.com/(param1)/a/(param2)/x/y >> >> Is this correct? > > I don't see how this is mentioned in the report. To me it just looks > like case (1) should be supported as well.
It is not mentioned in the report. For me it looked like cases (1) and (2) should be similar, that's why I asked "is this correct?". :) -- Alexandru Stanoi eZ Components System Developer eZ Systems | http://ez.no -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
