On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > Hi fellow ezc'ers! > > First of I wish you merry X-mas! :) > > Second I added a design draft for enhancement #010913 "Complex data > types (e.g. DateTime) for PersistentObject" [1] right before christmas > and already started implementing it (as the main design was already > fixed during the last summer conference and noted in the issue). Please > take a look at PersistentObject/design/design-1.4.txt (last section) and > state any comments here. > > Beside this request for review, I'd like to discuss a naming issue with > you. So far I named the interface for data type conversions > "ezcPersistentObjectPropertyConversion", because the classes > implementing it will perform a conversion. By now I think this name > sounds kinda strange and should actually be > "ezcPersistentObjectPropertyConverter" instead. What do you think?
Class names should be nouns, not actions, so ezcPersistentObjectPropertyConverter is more logical. regards, Derick -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
