On 01/31/2008 09:46 AM Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Tobias Schlitt wrote:

>> On 01/29/2008 01:09 AM James Pic wrote:

>>> Tobias Struckmeier wrote:

>>>>>> - Input abstraction (also see above)
>>>>>>> - Routing
>>>>>>> - Controllers
>>>>>>> - Output abstraction

>>>> I want to add here:
>>>> - A standard "URL building mechanism" should be there that helps to
>>>> build the urls for the specific contexts (eg. AJAX), make redirections
>>>> etc.

>>> Isn't it possible to do with Url component natively ?

>> Partly, yes. But the idea is to not rely on Url for the Mvc in a first 
>> place, but to possibly offer a tie-in (later). Therefore we need to 
>> abstract that somehow. I'd suggest to go with GET parameters for the 
>> very basic implementation and offer a mechanism that makes use of Url 
>> through a tie-in.

> I actually don't mind if this is a dependency. I never like the concept 
> of using GET parameters yourself as that's such a pain. We've the Url 
> component to handle this, and as Mvc would be a slightly higher level 
> component, I don't see a dependency as bad.

I disagree here. Url is a nice component, but it is not suitable for 
everybody and is quite specialized in its handling. I'd more like to see 
this abstracted in a good was and that we build a tie-in.

Regards,
Toby
-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen / With kind regards

Tobias Schlitt (GPG: 0xC462BC14) eZ Components Developer

[EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ Systems AS | ez.no
-- 
Components mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Reply via email to