Derick Rethans wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, James Pic wrote: > > > Gaetano Giunta wrote: > > > > > > - in the end, MVC !== WEB. This is the biggest pain point with all these > > > routing/chaining problems. Mvc was dreamed in a different era, and fits > > > badly to modern-day web apps (unless maybe you do views in javascript). > > > Other things are also staring to show lots of wrinkles, see eg > > > http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001057.html for a nice insight > > > about keyboard navigation. > > > > I don't understand what you mean, doesn't that strictly depend on the view ? > > Very good article and the comments are even better btw. > > I think what he is trying to say is that MVC isn't really meant as a > pattern for web applications. It works much better in longer running GUI > apps where none of the overhead (router, controllers) have to be > reloaded on every request (action).
Isn't that what Mongrel, the HTTP server in Ruby for Rail does ? I agree that's a good idea but maybe it should be part of another component ? -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
