On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Thomas Nunninger wrote:
> we (my brother Josef and I) had a look at the YAML specification and wrote
> the
> requirements draft that you find attached to this mail.
Looks good, but as discussed on IRC, I would add the following points:
- part of the requirements should be the configuration tie-in, as that's
still the most asked question related to YAML.
- there should be an implementation of or two backeneds (pecl
extensions) — if not only to see how feasible it would be to integrate
them.
regards,
--
Derick Rethans
eZ components Product Manager
eZ systems | http://ez.no
--
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
