i don't say latency is not an issue, but mvc applications make it really easy to add caching at a later point without hazzle and that makes up lots of speed if needed.
also i made the observation, that although mvc frameworks hit php performance pretty hard, its not always observable for the end-user, since php time makes up only a short amount compared to either Database or UI (Javascript) stuff. On Tuesday 24 March 2009 09:50:11 Derick Rethans wrote: > On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:59:10 +0100, Gaetano Giunta <g...@ez.no> wrote: > > > An interesting blog post (an update in fact) about relative speed of > > > different frameworks in building a simple mvc app: > > > > > > http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=421 > > > > > > eZComponents are not included, mainly I think because when the original > > > test was carried out in 2006 the mvc component did not exist. > > > > > > It would be nice if somebody could find a couple of hours to create the > > > equivalent ezc-based app and test it. > > > Even if we do not come out first in terms of speed, just showing up > > > that blog page would be useful, I think. > > > > @gaetano: I can tell you ezcMvc is frikking fast in the hello world > > business. I haven't made a statistically sound benchmark but i did some > > siege testing ZF vs ezcMvc base apps (using the PHP View Handler) and ezc > > was faster by a multitude. > > Would you be interested in spending some time on this? It'd be good to > know what the ballpark difference is. Not only speed wise, but also > feature wise. > > > Also, performance is really a non-issue if you decide to use a > > framework/mvc implementation in my opinion. > > That I disagree with. Latency is something that's really annoying for > users. > > regards, > -- > Derick Rethans > eZ components Product Manager > eZ systems | http://ez.no -- Benjamin Eberlei http://www.beberlei.de -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
