Sebastian Hartnick schrieb: > Dear Sebastian Bergmann, Hello Sebastian,
> We're interested in using you Workflow implementation of > ezComponenets. > But need to support a visual designing tool to create the > workflows. > How hard is it to change the xml or database storage definition > to a more widely used (and editor supported) format like > BPEL or XPDL or something like that. fundamentally, all workflow/process languages can be mapped to petri nets, thus they are equivalent. I have no idea how hard it would be to "convert" BPEL or XPDL, for instance, to the workflow component's XML dialect. That said, the best approach would probably be parsing an BPEL/XPDL file, creating an object graph using the Workflow Definition API, and then save the object graph to the component's own XML. > Or is there already an implementation of this XML formats? Not that I am aware of. > Regards > S. Hartnick Kind regards, Sebastian -- Sebastian Bergmann System Developer s...@ez.no | eZ Systems | http://ez.no
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
