On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bertrand Dunogier wrote: > 2009/5/15 Derick Rethans <d...@ez.no> > > > On Sat, 9 May 2009, Hans-Christian Otto wrote:> to transform an action like > > foo_bar to a method name like "doFooBar". > > > Wouldn't "dofoobar" be enough? > > > > > > Using > > > > > > $actionMethod = 'do' . preg_replace( '@[^A-Za-z]@', '', $action ); > > > > > > should result in the same method. > > > > > > So, why do you still use camelcase here? > > > > You're right that the code would work fine. However, if we use camel > > case, the method names also show up nicely in error message and stack > > traces, making debugging easier. > > Wouldn't it be better to make this optional ?
Why? It's not like this is heavy code. You'd lose time checking for it... to counter the function call. regards, Derick -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
