Original Sender : Ryo Saeba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------
At 03:09 AM 4/26/99 +0700, Forrest Dump wrote:
>Dengan PIII-500 skor Quake2 (Crusher demo) ;
>@1024*768 = 51.9 fps
>@800*600 = 43.4 fps
>( jadi pertanyaan koq di Cel300@450 relatif sama dengan PIII-500? ..
>sudah terjadi bottleneck? .. )
Beneran tuh nggak kebalik? Kok 800*600 malah lebih lambat?
>Videologic NEON 250 mempunyai fillrate 125 Mpixels/sec
>Dengan PIII-500 skor Quake2 (Crusher demo) ;
>@1024*768 = 55 fps
>@800*600 = 51.1 fps
Lho, sama juga, kok malah melambat di resolusi yang lebih kecil? Fenomena
apa nih?
>>Quake2@1024*768
>> 16 bit 22 bit
>>crusher 46.8 45.2 -3.42%
>>Quake2@800x600
>> 16 bit 22 bit
>>crusher 51.9 51.9 0.00%
Tuh, kalo yang Celeron ini 800*600-nya masih lebih cepet dibanding
1024-nya. Aneh ya?
Btw, si Neon teh udah combo belum ya? Sorry lupa, hehe.
I want to live for love,
not to die for love - CiTyHuNTeR
----------------------------------------------------------------
Compu-Mania MailingList is provided by PT Centrin Utama
Maintained by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Post a msg : Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe : Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BODY : unsubscribe Compu-Mania
For more information, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "HELP" in the BODY of your mail (without quote).
----------------------------------------------------------------
