On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Michael Williams<[email protected]> wrote: > Section 3.2 describes a pair of tests that took about 4.2 minutes each (if > my calculations are correct). Why not play more games and have each game > contain more simulations? Writing the code and the paper is the hard part, > waiting for a computer to run your code is easy.
I guess there is a mistake in that paragraph, since you can't run a full game in .25 seconds. That's probably the time per move, so the whole test might have taken 10 or 20 hours. > > Peter Drake wrote: >> >> An improvement on the UCB/UCT formula: >> >> Stogin, J., Chen, Y.-P., Drake, P., and Pellegrino, S. (2009) “The Beta >> Distribution in the UCB Algorithm Applied to Monte-Carlo Go”. In Proceedings >> of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, CSREA >> Press. >> >> http://webdisk.lclark.edu/drake/publications/BetaDistribution.pdf >> >> Peter Drake >> http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
