> Would it typically help or disrupt to start
> instead with values that are non-random?
> What I have in mind concretely:

Can I correctly rephrase your question as: if you take a well-trained
komi 7.5 network, then give it komi 5.5 training data, will it adapt
quickly, or would it be faster/better to start over from scratch? (From
the point of view of creating a strong komi 5.5 program.) (?)


Surely it would train much more quickly: all the early layers are about
learning liberty counting, atari and then life/death, good shape, etc.
(But, it would be fascinating if an experiment showed that wasn't the
case, and starting from a fresh random network trained more quickly!)

Darren
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to