On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 13:22 -0400, Chris Fant wrote: > It's perfectly fine to prefer a game of perfect information over a > game of imperfect information, but I don't think it's fair to say that > poker is a dilution of the concept of playing strength (neither do the > poker pros).
Why isn't it? Do you deny there is a "guess what the other guy is thinking" aspect? And that this aspect is a lot more malleable and ill-defined than something like Go strength? -Jeff _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
