-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think something is wrong - Neither program should be doing as well as it is. I specifically remember a point of diminishing returns, but it was around 5000 - in other words 2500 was still measurably weaker.
I don't have time to check it out until later today - but take the results with a grain of salt. If I find a problem I will reset the K factor and continue to run with the correct factor. - - Don Jason House wrote: > > > On 9/28/07, *Jason House* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Since there's obviously some kind of major performance gap, for now > I'll aim to align with Anchor_1k. From there, I hope it'll be > easier to diagnose what's going wrong. > > > > Correction: I meant to say GenAnchor_1k > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG/QCDDsOllbwnSikRAjdTAKCUe6E2zY9wbb2ejlFm0HbTcDkRxACffBpu OzkLQSyTnbO/e5DcT9L1gH0= =Pp9Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
