Any of those with recent Lisp experience have any opinions about multicore
capabilities?
What I've googled so far looks a bit rudimentary - mostly based on unix fork
semantics. I'm looking for something much lighter-weight, Erlang-style, which
could support thousands of cheap concurrent threads. In Erlang, the cost of
such threads is comparable to the cost of a function call.
Terry McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They mean to govern well; but they mean to govern. They promise to be kind
masters; but they mean to be masters. -- Daniel Webster
----- Original Message ----
From: Nick Apperson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: computer-go <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:09:32 PM
Subject: [computer-go] Lisp time
I've been (and still am) a die hard supporter of C++, but since I program in
C++ for work (we develop gamelike software) I get tired of C++ day in and out.
I'd also like to push myself to learn some new things.
Lisp seems to me like a language I could really come to respect. I run linux
(no windows, period) and I am comfortable with command-line if I need to be.
Anyway, I'm trying to figure out what the best way would be to learn lisp so
that I can begin working on a computer go program in it. I can't even figure
out what the right dielect would be for computer go.
Any of you out there using lisp want to maybe point me in the right direction
for how to learn this language as it applies to writing a go program? Thanks.
- Nick
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
