"Huh" is right. You wrote C2 C1 and so did I, but I somehow did so while looking at C1 C2. I'm not sure how I managed that myself.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Gunnar Farnebäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huh? A seki doesn't get much more basic than this. > > 4 X X X X X . X . X 4 > 3 . O O O O X X O . 3 > 2 O O O . O O X . . 2 > 1 . X X X O X X . . 1 > A B C D E F G H J > > /Gunnar > > > Eric Boesch wrote: > > Black doesn't need the lower-right corner as territory after killing > > the lower left. After B B1 W C2 B C1 W H3 B G3, w gains about 7 > > points in the lower right but has already lost like 31 in the lower > > left, and black wins by 15. Either I'm missing something obvious, or > > you overlooked that the lower left is not a seki, or something like > > that. > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Gunnar Farnebäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Yamato wrote: > >> > I attached the fixed version to this email. Thanks for your help. > >> > >> Another correction. In 119 black has a serious weakness on the right. > >> Is there any way for black to win after B B1, W C2, B C1, W H3? > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
