Thank you for a long, very interesting report, Nick.

I found a typo(?), however, about the version of HBotSVN.  Jason wrote
earlier games were played by r761 but you wrote by r763.

-Hideki

Nick Wedd: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>In message 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason 
>House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Is it possible to show the board for the round 1 open division game? 
>>You refer specifically to a choice made at move 60...
>
>I have added a diagram.  But it turns out my analysis was wrong, I now 
>think that by move 60 White had no way of winning.
>
>>Also, the processor description for HBotSVN is incorrect.  Rounds 1-6
>>were through a virtual machine on a box with a 2GHz Intel Core Duo.   
>>Rounds 7-9 was running native on a Dual Core T2330 (1.6GHz/533Mhz
>>FSB/1MB cache).
>>
>>It also turns out that rounds 7-9 were run with a newer version of the
>>bot.  IIRC, they ran with HouseBot 0.7 r763 while the earlier rounds
>>were run with HouseBot 0.7 r761.
>
>Ok, I have corrected this, thank you for telling me.
>
>Nick
>
>>On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Nick Wedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  AyaMC and StoneGrid were the winners of yesterday's KGS bot
>>  tournament, both undefeated, with 6/6 and 9/9 wins respectively.  My
>>  report is at
>>  http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/39/index.html
>>
>>  It is longer than usual, because I found quite a few of the games
>>  interesting.
>>
>>  Nick
>>  --
>>  Nick Wedd   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  computer-go mailing list
>>  [email protected]
>>  http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>_______________________________________________
>>computer-go mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato)
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to