I'm working on bayeselo now.   I have to kludge something together,  the
server wasn't designed for this.  

Maybe I will have something in an hour or two, or maybe not.

- Don


On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 16:33 -0700, David Fotland wrote:
> It's too early.  I've run mfgo11 before and it's rating settled down around
> 1700 I think, just a little weaker than gnugo.  So it is still rising (and
> being held back by a few loses to other programs that are still rising).
> 
> In testing, the monte carlo Many Faces beats mfgo version 11 over 95%, but
> only on a few dozen games.  So 400 ELO improvement might be about right.
> 
> David 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of steve uurtamo
> > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 3:43 PM
> > To: computer-go
> > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Some cgos 19x19 suggestions
> > 
> > david, is mfgo-12-0805-2c really over 400 ELO better
> > than mfgo-11, as cgos seems to suggest?  or is mfgo11
> > still rising up into place?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > s.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, David Fotland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > games.com> wrote:
> > > First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19
> > server.
> > >
> > > Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list until
> > it
> > > ages off.  I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after some
> > time
> > > that depends on the number of games they have played.  Since 19x19
> > games
> > > take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much time
> > to age
> > > off the list, for the same number of games.  I like seeing the top
> > program's
> > > results a little longer.
> > >
> > > It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly.
> > Since the
> > > games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the
> > initial
> > > 1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos.  Does it make
> > sense to
> > > set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial rating
> > to
> > > 1500 instead of 1200?
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > computer-go mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to