On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:12 AM, "David Fotland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
games.com> wrote:
This is an interesting idea, but do you have any actual results? If
you
implement this kind of rave formula do you get a stronger program?
I don't have enough data to say anything except that it did not have a
large (100 ELO+) change.
I switched to this method just before the July KGS tournament. Both
the old and new versions were untuned, but based on parameters I've
heard on this list. My testing on CGOS is tough to draw conclusions
from.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason House
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 4:34 AM
To: computer-go
Subject: Re: [computer-go] MoGo v.s. Kim rematch
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:08 -0300, Douglas Drumond wrote:
Attached is a quick write up of what I was talking about with some
math.
PS: Any tips on cleanup and making it a mini publication would be
appreciated. I've never published a paper before. Would this be too
small?
Better add an abstract, but what I missed most was bibliography.
Ask and you shall receive :)
Actually, I spent most of my free time learning Tex/Lyx, so there are
very few changes in this version. I'm out of time for a while, so I
figured I'd just share what I have so far.
[]'s
Douglas Drumond
-------------------------------------
Computer Engineering
FEEC/IC - Unicamp
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
