Don, thanks for providing these statistics!

Overall it suggests that on CGOS White only has a small advantage. I
still don't like this, but it is not nearly as bad as I initially
suspected.

The initially decreasing percentages are somewhat puzzling. One might
speculate that up to a certain level Black's strategy to dominate the
center is easier, and White needs significant resources to learn how
to build two sufficiently large living groups.

My guess is that for 5-minute CGOS games the average level of play is
still weak enough to keep White's advantage relatively close to 50%.
I'm not sure how many programs actually play at peak strength on CGOS,
but in the future we may expect to see an increasing group suffering
from the large komi.

Maybe it would be interesting to compare recent games to older games
to see if there is a trend in the top group?

Erik



On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I'm doing the komi study.   I hope this data formats properly on
> your email clients.
>
> I am not including the first day or two of games because I remember
> that I started out with 6.5 komi but I think that only lasted a few
> hours.
>
> I'm including ALL games unless they ended with an illegal move.
>
> I'm using bayeselo ratings.  So each bot has only 1 rating over it's
> entire lifetime of games.
>
> I do not include games where either player played less than 20 games.
> 20 games does not give a very accurate rating, but I had to draw the
> line somewhere.  However it's probably within 100 ELO of being
> correct.
>
> I require opponents to be within 100 ELO of each other.  I ran this
> many times using different minimum ELO values.
>
> The data seems to indicate that white's winning percentage at 7.5 komi
> DECREASES with the strength of the players in general.
>
> HOWEVER, the 2500 ELO entry is intriguing.  It shows a sudden jump
> with a sample of 3400 games.  Does anyone have an explanation for
> that?  Is this just sample error?  Or are the programs finally strong
> enough to start seeing that white wins at 7.5 komi?
>
> Another interesting fact is that whites win percentage drops below 50%
> with some of these entries (stronger players.)
>
>
>  DIFF  MIN ELO    WHITE    TOTAL  PERCENT
> -----  -------  -------  -------  -------
>  100        0    74513   141579   52.630
>  100      100    74513   141579   52.630
>  100      200    74511   141577   52.629
>  100      300    74191   141054   52.598
>  100      400    73723   140308   52.544
>  100      500    73524   140009   52.514
>  100      600    73427   139874   52.495
>  100      700    72763   138921   52.377
>  100      800    72335   138212   52.336
>  100      900    71227   136490   52.185
>  100     1000    71192   136432   52.181
>  100     1100    71084   136231   52.179
>  100     1200    68862   132356   52.028
>  100     1300    67765   130428   51.956
>  100     1400    66562   128193   51.923
>  100     1500    64143   123672   51.865
>  100     1600    56458   108767   51.907
>  100     1700    53943   103828   51.954
>  100     1800    40790    78999   51.634
>  100     1900    18403    36247   50.771
>  100     2000    16859    33340   50.567
>  100     2100    13793    27399   50.341
>  100     2200     8986    18072   49.723
>  100     2300     8555    17266   49.548
>  100     2400     7686    15569   49.367
>  100     2500     1801     3400   52.971
>  100     2600       12       28   42.857
>
> When I use a window of 200 ELO the data looks very similar.
>
> Here is the data when I require the difference to be 50 ELO or less:
>
>  DIFF  MIN ELO    WHITE    TOTAL  PERCENT
> -----  -------  -------  -------  -------
>   50        0    46184    87556   52.748
>   50      100    46184    87556   52.748
>   50      200    46183    87555   52.747
>   50      300    46031    87326   52.712
>   50      400    45890    87100   52.687
>   50      500    45815    86996   52.663
>   50      600    45813    86993   52.663
>   50      700    45376    86377   52.533
>   50      800    45108    85932   52.493
>   50      900    44050    84302   52.253
>   50     1000    44032    84277   52.247
>   50     1100    43969    84163   52.243
>   50     1200    42840    82193   52.121
>   50     1300    42361    81354   52.070
>   50     1400    41503    79735   52.051
>   50     1500    41003    78853   51.999
>   50     1600    37959    72933   52.046
>   50     1700    36280    69569   52.150
>   50     1800    28478    54845   51.925
>   50     1900     8535    16668   51.206
>   50     2000     7896    15433   51.163
>   50     2100     6823    13349   51.112
>   50     2200     4145     8120   51.047
>   50     2300     3917     7704   50.844
>   50     2400     3627     7166   50.614
>   50     2500     1497     2871   52.142
>   50     2600       12       28   42.857
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to