Good question. I didn't even notice that. On investigation, I had a bug in my shuffle code. I'm embarrassed to say what I had in there the first time, but
here is the fixed code...
I replaced this Java code:
Collections.shuffle(mvlst);
with this C# code:
for (int i = 0; i < mvlst.Count; i++)
{
int selected = (int)Math.Floor(rng.NextDouble() * (valid.Length -
i)) + i;
int temp = mvlst[i];
mvlst[i] = mvlst[selected];
mvlst[selected] = temp;
}
Here are the new results:
genmove b
= E5
(took 84 seconds -- this is faster now because I accidentally compiled
a debug assembly before)
ref-nodes
= 111103758
ref-score
= 0.523571
I will send a ZIP file to the person who requested it.
Don, have you ever used Mono? Maybe you could get it running in Linux and get
that performance number.
Don Dailey wrote:
It rarely plays anything other that E5, was E6 a fluke? The other
numbers look correct to me.
I haven't posted the Vala version yet, but I bet it would be even easier
to port from it, since Vala is heavily based on C#. I thought it was
pretty easy to port from Java to Vala except that I spent too much time
digging around in the documentation because I don't know C# or Vala or
barely Java.
- Don
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 00:46 -0400, Michael Williams wrote:
Porting the Java version to C# was really easy. Here are the numbers for 0.5
komi and 1000000 playouts:
genmove b
= E6
(took 136 seconds)
ref-nodes
= 111061901
ref-score
= 0.523573
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
