On 11/18/08, Michael Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It doesn't make any sense to me from a theoretical perspective. Do you > have empirical evidence?
I agree that empirical evidence is required, but theoretically, if MC converges to something that is not perfect play, then as the number of playouts goes up, the probability of playing a different move (the perfect move) goes down, so the programme could get weaker. Does that make sense? The effect may depend on the opponent.
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
