the thing about "within manhattan distance (small) of other stones" type
heuristics is that they seem to leave out the possibility of tenuki.

s.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Lavergne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've not tryed it for the moment due to lack of time for computer go,
> but I've thinked about an opening heuristic thta from a go player point
> of view seems acceptable :
> - For the first play, restrict to intersection at a manhatan distance of
>  2 from the corner hoshi (4-4 points) (and tengen if you want ot allow
>  a more cosmic style)
> - Next restrict to a manhatan distance of 2 from :
>    - Corner hoshi
>    - Side hoshi if at there is a stone in at least one of the corners
>  and manhatan distance of 3 from stones already on board
> As the game progress, increase theses distance progressively. Probably
> something like add 1 to each every five moves.
>
> Play on the first line are forbidden until mid-game, unless there is a
> stone in manhatan distance of 2.
>
> You can stop using early, for example at play 15 or 20, or wait to the
> time were there is no restriction due to the ever increasing number of
> stone and distance restriction.
>
> This cover most of professional games, and seems for me sufficiently
> conservative.
> Other policies can reduce more the search tree, but from my point of
> view they can prune too much the search tree.
>
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:29:40AM +0900, Darren Cook wrote:
>> > Most of those 55 distinct moves are rarely used in the opening. I
>> > once heard a simple rule which seems to cover just about everything
>> > interesting: "consider only moves which are on the 3rd and 4th lines,
>> > and/or within a manhattan distance of n, for some small n, of some
>> > other stone already on the board."
>>
>> Wandering off the opening theme a bit, but the book, Oriental Strategy
>> in a Nutshell, by Bruce and Sue Wilcox has numerous rules of thumb of
>> this nature. It will probably appeal to the people on this list more
>> than the wishy-washy "play here because it feels good" style of most
>> traditional go books. The rules might be useful in MC heavy playouts.
>>
>> Going back to the topic, for 19x19 at least, I would suggest make an
>> opening book from pro and strong amateur games. Only start using MCTS
>> once you leave the book. Using MCTS on the first move is like trying to
>> use a precision screwdriver to hammer in a three-inch nail: your tool
>> will break before you get any worthwhile results.
>>
>> Darren
>>
>> --
>> Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer
>> http://dcook.org/mlsn/ (English-Japanese-German-Chinese-Arabic
>>                         open source dictionary/semantic network)
>> http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work)
>> http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles)
>> _______________________________________________
>> computer-go mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>
>
> --
> Thomas Lavergne                    "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter
>                                     necessitatem." (Guillaume d'Ockham)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                            http://oniros.org
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to