> From: Isaac Deutsch <i...@gmx.ch>
 
> Do you think the spent allocating could be critical?
> What do you think would be a good way to deal with this? I think to avoid the 
> continuous allocation/deallocation,
> it's necessary to keep the threads running instead of creating/joining them 
> for 
> each genmove. This would
> allow them to only have to alloc/dealloc when the board size is changed.

If your threads persist from move to move, you will save not only the
expense of allocating and deallocating a large memory pool, but also the
cost of creating new processes.


On the other hand, you will need a quick method of clearing old information 
from previous nodes.
 
Terry McIntyre <terrymcint...@yahoo.com>

-- Libertarians Do It With Consent!


      
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to