that is correct.
2009/4/20 Don Dailey <dailey....@gmail.com>: > That should be interesting. > > So we have > > 1. ego-v0.115-100k > > 2. libEGO-v0.115-100k > > Is that correct? We can watch it's bayelo rating as well as it's > incremental rating. > > - Don > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Łukasz Lew <lukasz....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Rated: 1713 as of 2007-12-29 09:28:46 >> http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/cross/libEGO-v0.115-100k.html >> >> I am running exactly the same binary file to check it recent rating. >> ego-v0.115-100k >> >> Lukasz >> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 20:16, Christoph Birk <b...@ociw.edu> wrote: >> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, ?ukasz Lew wrote: >> >> >> >> Is there a rating drift? I remember that pure UCT no RAVE with 100k >> >> playouts got over 1700 elo. >> > >> > That seems a little high. My 50k-pure-UCT searcher is around >> > 1580 for a long time. >> > >> > Christoph >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > computer-go mailing list >> > computer-go@computer-go.org >> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
