By result, do you mean this observation or a quest for an explanation? If you merely wish to say that many/most current UCT programs have no need for an exploration term, then that is a context-specific (e.g. not for the "E-E in Go" paper) heuristic or experimental statement, not a formal one. A source for such a statement has to be more than a paper that simply notices a similar effect for their own application. One would have to reference a larger body of experimentalists or a general consensus.
Just my humble opinion, Cenny Wenner On 11/9/09, Peter Drake <dr...@lclark.edu> wrote: > Many of us have concluded that, with RAVE, there is no need for a UCT > exploration term: > > http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2009-June/018773.html > > Is there a published source on this result that I could cite? > > Thanks, > > Peter Drake > http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
