How about you read the paper first? The conversation would make much more sense if you actually spent some time trying to understand the details of what they did. :) <-- (mandatory smiley to indicate I am not upset or anything)
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Greg Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > The articles I've read so far about AlphaGo mention both MCTS and > RL/Q-Learning. Since MCTS (and certainly UCT) keeps statistics on wins and > propagates that information up the tree, that in and of itself would seem > to constitute RL, so how does it make sense to have both? It seems > redundant to me. Any thoughts on that? > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
