he is muted for a good reason. And "classical " approach was done for decades did no lead much to anything. So I would be interested on the paper ONLY if author has implemented his/her ideas and measured performance. Otherwise it would be waste of time with at least 95% probability
Petri 2016-08-12 1:22 GMT+03:00 Gonçalo Mendes Ferreira <go...@sapo.pt>: > Hello, I'm sharing with you a document that was shared in the GNU Go > mailing list and I found interesting. Its author is currently muted from > this list, but I think it is very much worth sharing here instead. > > There haven't been many papers on a classical approach to Go in recent > years (decade?). > > Here it is > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2818149 > > The original thread can be found at > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-devel/2016-08/msg00002.html > > Cheers, > Gonçalo > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
