On 26-10-17 10:55, Xavier Combelle wrote: > It is just wild guesses based on reasonable arguments but without > evidence.
David Silver said they used 40 layers for AlphaGo Master. That's more evidence than there is for the opposite argument that you are trying to make. The paper certainly doesn't talk about a "small" and a "big" Master. You seem to be arguing from a bunch of misreadings and misunderstandings. For example, Figure 3 in the paper shows the Elo plot for the 20 block/40 layer version, and it compares to Alpha Go Lee, not Alpha Go Master. The Alpha Go Master line would be above the flattening part of the 20 block/40 layer AlphaGo Zero. I guess you missed this when you say that they "only mention it to compare on kifu prediction"? -- GCP _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
