On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Erik van der Werf
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think I remember seeing some benchmarks suggesting that the latest
> i7's should give roughly twice of what I was getting on a Core2 from
> some 3 years ago. I don't think they even had to overclock (which
> apparently is quite easy as well)...
>
> Anyway, I could be wrong, or it could depend on how you count logical
> cores. Better if someone replies who actually has new hardware, but
> otherwise just assume something between 100k and 200k (for pure light
> playouts, no tree).

I admit, my 'evidence' is only anecdotal. I used to have an iMac core2
with 2 Ghz. Then I got a MacPro with 2.8Ghz two years later (two years
ago). That one was about 50%-60% faster per core, which is marginally
faster than the clock-speed implies. Now I have a spanking new iMac
with a 2.66 Ghz i5 at work, which is the same speed as the 2.8Ghz
MacPro. I don't have a computer with an i7 in it, so I can't say
anything about how it performs with respect to the computers I worked
with the past few years. But unless the i7 is dramatically faster than
the i5, I haven't seen much progress over the past four years. But
even if the i7 is twice as fast as a Core2, as you say, it took four
years to get there. And it was not four years ago when Lukasz reported
his numbers.

When I look at published benchmark tests, the MacPro should be more
than three times faster than the Core2 iMac. But my own benchmarks for
several Go-related tests don't show that at all. In that case I go
with my own numbers, instead of some published pie in the sky.

If an Intel i7 can do 200K playouts, let's show it. :) Should be
relatively easy to verify. Anyone have an i7?

>The strongest programs have the slowest playouts :-)

I don't know if that's exactly true. But we were discussing light
playouts. We all know that that by itself does not give the strongest
program.

Mark
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to