> For anyone who is interested in this, that is reported in this paper > (see section 3): > http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/36/97/83/PDF/ouvertures9x9.pdf > > (I think these results should be taken with a grain of salt, as it is > just self-play, but it does fit the other evidence.) > > Darren
Hi all, When reading this paper, which describes the "coevolution" of a 9x9 opening book using mcts on top of mcts, I was wondering whether this would make for a strong go player under regular time-settings, too. In other words, that player would be a standard MCTS player, but for playouts, move generation is done by MCTS, too. So you get "inner" and "outer" playouts. I think this would require that the inner playouts are rather light to get any benefit at all. Also, strong move ordering / pruning should be used to get values more quickly, including RAVE. Maybe this is feasible with current hardware with the amount of inner playouts being around 100-1000, and still get 100-1000 "outer playouts"/second (9x9)? Regards, Isaac -- Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
