Hi Yamato,
No, not related to simulation balancing. But that is the direction we will
work on. We believe Simulation Balancing has much more potential. Anyway, MM
is not a good method for training the parameters of the playout.
Aja
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yamato" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Monte-Carlo Simulation Balancing in Practice
Aja wrote:
At that time, Erica's strength on 19x19 was still weak, as showned in the
paper. So, I let Erica play against GnuGo 3.8 Level 0, not Level 10. Also,
Level 0 plays much faster. Another important reason is, we were trying to
make the winning rate closer to 50% to get better statistical observation.
I got very much improvement on 19x19 for past several months.
Is the improvement on 19x19 related to Simulation Balancing?
--
Yamato
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
