On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Michael Williams < [email protected]> wrote:
> That's equivalent to ELO. > > Yes, because ELO is just a mathematical way to predict who will win the game. ELO is also just so much easier to understand. > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Stefan Kaitschick > <[email protected]> wrote: > > difference in rank = number of handicap stones > > is very convinient ofcourse. > > An alternative way to look at this is to say: > > if player A beats player B 70% of the time in an even game(with komi) > player > > A is 1 rank higher. > > (Ranking systems make this kind of presumption. Maybe somebody on the > list > > can supply the value KGS uses) > > This would accommodate an almost infinite number of ranks within the span > of > > the last stone towards perfection. > > > > Stefan > > > >> For amateurs, rank is defined as the number of handicap stones for an > even > >> game. For pro's it's somewhat arbitrary, depending on good results in > the > >> rating tournaments over many games. Of course Elo is a European chess > >> concept and is not used for traditional games in Asia. A 9 dan pro is > >> perhaps two or three handicap stones stronger than a 1 dan pro, so there > >> are > >> more than one pro rank per handicap stone. > >> > >> David > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:computer-go- > >>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Williams > >>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 9:41 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] cgos 19x19 gets interesting > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Mark Boon<[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> If you accept that the number of 'dan' ranks for a handicap stone > >>>> increases, maybe the difference in rank between god and a 9p may > >>>> actually be very, very high as the number of ranks accounting for the > >>>> last stone could be dozens or more. > >>> > >>> Clearly being able to given a stone and have an even match is not what > >>> is used to define rank. Is ELO used to define rank? If not, then > >>> isn't it a largely arbitrary measure? > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Computer-go mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Computer-go mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Computer-go mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
