On Oct 31, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Heikki Levanto <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have been thinking that it might make sense to take the move with the > highest *lower* confindence bound and play that move. In a way, that would > be the move we have least reason to believe will be a blunder. > > But I am just a programmer, not a mathematician, so what do I know. If I had > more time and energy, I'd make many experiments. But at the moment, all I can > afford is to follow this list...
I experimented with that a long time ago. I think the CGOS ratings were within 20 ELO of each other which is really just noise. I should have used a better evaluation technique. _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
