Amazing! Basically, it is your opinion that in a match betweer Rybka and a
human champion like Anand or Carlsen, the computer would win 80% of games,
and draw the rest? That a human world champion would be unable to draw even
half of his games, even given White to start?
 
It is too hard to believe, IMO. In the absence of a match, the explanation
of drift in an isolated rating system is a more believable theory.
 
Brian

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Dailey
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 2:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] new predictions?



On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jacques BasaldĂșa <[email protected]> wrote:


Don Dailey wrote:



To the best I can estimate it is something like 300 ELO
now which means in a short match there is almost no chance 


> for the human.

It is more than that, around 500. Only a match with a handheld
device could be seen as similar strength:



I'm being ultra conservative when I say 300 and I consider it an absolute
lower bound.   The reason one must be careful is that there is some slop in
equating computers to humans.     Computers have their own ratings lists
which attempt to be in line with human ratings but it is widely believed
that the top programs have some distortion - in other words they are a bit
over rated compared to humans.   Programs that are a few hundred ELO weaker
are not over-rated but the top ones are.       Computer vs Computer can
produce these distortions.    

So 300 is the lowest figure I would be willing to stake my life on - but I
believe it's probably more like 400 or maybe even your 500 value.    Larry
Kaufman has produced a formula that he thinks will give more accurate ELO
ratings to the top machines,  it basically compresses the ratings of program
with more than a certain ELO and I forget how it works.     I don't think it
removes more than 100 ELO so maybe 400 is pretty close to the right value -
but in either case I think it's absolutely clear than computers are superior
and it's not even close.  

Don




 


Top humans are near 2800 (ratings.fide.com)

Rank Name Title Country Rating Games B-Year
 1  Carlsen, Magnus  g  NOR  2826  0  1990
 2  Topalov, Veselin  g  BUL  2803  0  1975
 3  Anand, Viswanathan  g  IND  2800  0

Google for Rybka elo:

On a phone:

Pocket Rybka 3: 2869 ELO on PocketPC? 23 Aug 2008

17.01.2009 Deep Rybka 3 x64 2GB Q6600 2.4 3227

I read somewhere (ICGA Journal I think) that it is over
3300 now.

So about 500 points over the top human.


Jacques.



_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go



_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to