I have settled on i5 760, but I'm thinking of purchasing a 1090T soon, so hopefully, I will have a report soon.
Fuming On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Petr Baudis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:30:49AM +0800, Fuming Wang wrote: > > I am not doing any tree updates, just pure MC simulation. > > Ok, I see! > > > 1090T has 6 core and i5 has 4 core, however i5 is better at level 3 > > caching (I've been told), so don't know which factor dominates. > > I do not think you really need L3 for anything in case of just pure MC > simulation, unless your board structure is prohibitively large? > > > i7 920 with 6 core should definitely better than 1090T. > > i7-920 has just four cores. And the benchmarks I have seen had been > _far_ from clearly in favor even of the i7 iterations newer than 920. > Overally, it seems to boil down to the particular workload. So I'm > really curious. > > Petr "Pasky" Baudis > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
