On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Jacques Basaldúa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. Perhaps Erica may be of help. 10 months ago it > won the Olympiad, so it should be strong enough. If > Aja is so kind to let us copy of the binary. > > 2. I can donate cpu, but it will be better in 3 weeks > when I return from a short holiday and have a new > machine more. > > 3. Maybe the idea of using a special CGOS makes it > easier for everybody. > I thought of CGOS, but CGOS is a terrible solutions for this specific thing because it would have to be configured for a really long time control in order to avoid time forfeits. But it will not schedule a round until all games are complete from the previous round so most computers would be idle most of the time. It would be better to have a system that keeps all computers busy all of the time. On the other hand, that is a pretty simple way to do it but don't know if we would have the patience for it ... The previous study was good because it represented a huge amount of CPU effort, it was not just running a few games for a couple of days but it was thousands of games played on 40 or 50 cores over a period of weeks. I don't think CGOS would be good for this. I'm still thinking about how it might be done without a huge amount of effort on my part - I would really like to do this study. Let me ask the group this question: How do you run automated testing under CGOS conditions (other than using CGOS?) What tools are available that work under Linux? Don > > > Jacques. > > > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/computer-go<http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go> >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
