It was weaker, but I have to do more experiments. I didn’t compare move proposals. I just ran 2000-game tournaments vs gnugo before and after. Win rage went from 84.9% to 78.9%. I need to try it again with fewer variables and more games. I still think it is a great tool.
David > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:computer-go- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of "Ingo Althöfer" > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 5:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Computer-go] CrazyStone in the 5-dan footsteps of Zen > > Hi David, > > David Fotland on CLOP-optimization: > > I tried it, but got no benefit so far. It claimed to find better settings > > for most parameters, but when I used them the program wasn�t any > > stronger. > > Interestant. Had it similar strength or did it even become weaker? > How often did the move proposals by your "older" ManyFaces and the > CLOP-MF differ? > > Ingo. > -- > NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zur�ck-Garantie! > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
