In fact I have just figured out that there are problems with counting playounts 
when the number is low. I did not notice it in the past because I usually test 
with at least 250k. But I also have a minimum number of playouts per move that 
it will always search. The 10k versions hit this minimum, and may in fact 
search more than 10k playouts in a game.

Rémi

On 24 avr. 2012, at 20:33, Aja Huang wrote:

> On 9x9 Erica now scores about 85% on 300 playouts / move against GnuGo 3.8 
> Level 10, around of rating 2100. From current CGOS results looks like Crazy 
> Stone is much stronger. :)
> 
> Aja
> 
> 2012/4/24 ds <[email protected]>
> Thanks a lot,
> 
> there is a long way to go for us with this impressible strength:)
> 
> Detlef
> 
> Am Dienstag, den 24.04.2012, 19:43 +0200 schrieb Rémi Coulom:
> > In Crazy Stone, I set the total number of playouts per game, not per move.
> >
> > 250k per game is similar in strength to 2k playouts per move (a bit weaker, 
> > maybe). But it takes less time overall for one game (because I apply 
> > time-management heuristics to playouts), which allows faster testing.
> >
> > Rémi
> >
> > On 24 avr. 2012, at 18:38, ds wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I do not want to get all your secrets,
> > >
> > > but how do you do 250k playouts with seconds for a whole game on all
> > > boardsize with 4 cores?
> > >
> > > Or does reservation mean a minimum reservation?
> > >
> > > Detlef
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, den 24.04.2012, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Rémi Coulom:
> > >> I reserved a small 4-core node of our cluster to connect 9 fast 
> > >> instances of Crazy Stone, 3 for each board size.
> > >>
> > >> On 23 avr. 2012, at 19:48, ds wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> would be nice, if one could arrange a typical date, where one can hope
> > >>> to find more programs on cgos.
> > >>>
> > >>> E.g. once a week or once every two weeks on monday? Depending on the
> > >>> opponents one could let the programs run for some hours or some days.
> > >>>
> > >>> For the last weeks it was quite empty with only the standard programs
> > >>> running. You can only get rated around 1800ELO with some accuracy...
> > >>>
> > >>> Detlef
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Computer-go mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Computer-go mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Computer-go mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Computer-go mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to