Hi,
I think 700 playouts is maybe small.
When I got 60% against GNU Go with 10000 playouts, I could get 50%
with 5000 playouts. Now I get 60% with 400 playouts, but I need 350
playouts for 50%. So I have switched to selfplay, it is a bit
doubtful though.
I think tree selective ability is more important than playout quality
in small playouts like 700.
Regards,
Hiroshi Yamashita
----- Original Message -----
From: "Detlef Schmicker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 6:41 PM
Subject: [Computer-go] Measuring program strength
Hi,
I will try to fish for some secrets:)
Up to now I always was able to measure oakfoam improvenment by playing
against gnugo.
(700 playouts against gnugo level 10 and 300 playouts against gnugo
level 0)
But now we seem to be at a strenght, that makes this not very sensitive
anymore. I can change parameters,which have significant effects on
regression tests, but do not change playing strength against gnugo
anymore. I included fuego and pachi at a playing level playing 50%
against gnugo, but this only improved the sensibility a little.
How do you handle this problem?
What do you think is the reason?
Thanks a lot for any secrets:)
Detlef
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
