Am Samstag, den 21.12.2013, 13:10 +0100 schrieb Petr Baudis: > Hi! > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 08:18:50AM +0100, Detlef Schmicker wrote: > > Thanks a lot for sharing so much information. I am checking all your > > suggestions :) > > > > I wonder, if the biggest difference between fuego, oakfoam compared to > > pachi is not the use of progressive widening?! > > > > This might be narrowing the search very good for low number of playouts, > > but becoming useless later?! > > I admit that I forgot what oakfoam uses here. I think both Fuego and > Pachi are essentially Mogo clones in these regards, i.e. using Silver's > RAVE formula and node priors (almost like progressive bias). Fuego I did only noticed, it has a switch widening. I will check if it is turned on
>From oakfoam I know: We are using progressive bias and progressive widening. The later with t_n+1=t_n+ 20 * t_n^1.5 > > Petr "Pasky" Baudis > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
