I also reacted strongly negatively, but then a commenter mentioned that it was supposed to look like a brain … so while it did not look like real Go, it was supposed to look like the computer had a brain. A weak attempt at multi-meaning art.
Cheers, David G Doshay [email protected] On 1, Jul 2014, at 10:50 PM, Stefan Kaitschick <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice banana car. But the picture in the article is an abomination. > What got me hooked on go, a quarter century ago, was the first look at a real > go position. > I immediately felt a rush, that told me this game trumps all I had come to > know before. > So I'm really very unwilling to forgive that shitty banana go position right > at the top of the article. > > Stefan > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:44 PM, "Ingo Althöfer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Petr, > > > A nice article, thanks for sharing it! But the first image is like > > putting > > http://www.cars-10.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/weird_car_design.jpg > > as the title image of a (serious) article on Google's self-driving cars. > > well observed. My interpretation: Computer-Go has passed > at least the production board of "IEEE spectrum". ;-) > > Ingo. > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
