Yes, the xenon lights we've seen in the last few years can be pretty annoying. It seems to me that I read some articles in /Road and Track /and/ Car and Driver /20 or more years ago about how the best of the "modern" halogen headlights had reflectors that provided a nice horizontal line on the upper edge of the beam that was kinder to oncoming drivers.

I remember that the halogen lights were hotter running, but I don't recall reading about or experiencing any danger or fires from their heat.

As long as we're so far off topic: all the extra and extra bright lights we see on vehicles these days is annoying outrageous and disgustingly wasteful. But then, being outrageous and wasteful is part of the belligerence of our society gone astray. Most drivers used to know that driving lights, those extra bright high beams, were only to be used when there was no oncoming traffic and no one in front of you. Civilized behavior is quaint these days.

Jordan

Steve Rigby wrote:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Jordman wrote:

That's right, European cars had the much brighter and better designed headlights for years before the U.S. As I recall, halogen lights were illegal in this country at that time, essentially because there were no U.S. manufacturers making them. Eventually Sylvania, I think, started making them and all of a sudden it was a good idea, and legal. A nice little example of corporations holding back something that would benefit the public because it did not benefit a U.S. corporation.

However, the downside of this are the too-bright headlights. I am sure that you have seen plenty of these dangerous, blindingly bright headlamps on newer cars. Indeed, there are various initiatives to cause these new headlamps to be toned down in their brightness levels. And, no, it is not caused by poor aiming of the headlamps. It is the nature of the light itself. There is, it has been determined, a "sexy," mostly male oriented fascination among many buyers of new cars to have lots of bright lights for show purposes.

  Steve


************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************



************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************

Reply via email to